Similarly, 24-h energy intake following FastEx + NoMeal was significantly lower than FedEx + NoMeal (MD: −2095 kJ 95% CI, −3910 kJ to −280 kJ P = 0.024).

Within-lab energy intake was significantly lower during FastEx + NoMeal compared to FedEx + NoMeal (MD: −1326 kJ 95% CI, −2102 to −550 kJ P = 0.001). Ad libitum meal energy intake was significantly lower during FedEx + Meal compared to FedEx + NoMeal (MD: −489 kJ 95% CI, −898 to −80 kJ P = 0.019). Resultsġ7 published articles (23 studies) were identified. Random-effect network meta-analyses were performed for outcomes containing ≥5 studies.

Studies must have measured ad libitum meal energy intake, within-lab energy intake, 24-h energy intake, energy expenditure, subjective hunger, acyl-ghrelin, peptide YY, and/or glucagon-like peptide 1. MethodsĬENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched to identify randomised, crossover studies in healthy individuals that compared the following interventions: (i) fasted exercise with a standardised post-exercise meal, (ii) fasted exercise without a standardised post-exercise meal, (iii) fed exercise with a standardised post-exercise meal, (iv) fed exercise without a standardised post-exercise meal.

To determine the acute effect of fasted and fed exercise on energy intake, energy expenditure, subjective hunger and gastrointestinal hormone release.

Max level mass effect